Scientific consensus contradicts this claim.

Not medical advice — just what the research says.

What's still open

What the evidence found 3 findings
Based on 14 sources:
PMC peer-reviewed View
British Journal of Nutrition peer-reviewed View
Frontiers in Nutrition peer-reviewed View
PMC meta-analysis peer-reviewed View
Cochrane systematic review peer-reviewed View
PubMed systematic review peer-reviewed View
PMC - NIH peer-reviewed View
Cochrane Complementary Medicine institutional View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
JAMA peer-reviewed View
Stanford Medicine News institutional View
TCTMD news View
Contemporary Clinical Trials peer-reviewed View
Stanford Longevity Center institutional View
Based on 11 sources:
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health institutional View
National Geographic news View
PMC Research Article peer-reviewed View
Science Direct Journal peer-reviewed View
JAMA Internal Medicine peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
PubMed peer-reviewed View
PubMed peer-reviewed View
Examine.com institutional View
PMC - NIH peer-reviewed View
PMC - NIH peer-reviewed View
Based on 14 sources:
PMC peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
PMC Article peer-reviewed View
Public Health Collaboration Meta-Analysis institutional View
PubMed systematic review and meta-analysis peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate publication on dropout and weight loss success factors peer-reviewed View
BMJ systematic review and meta-analysis news View
PMC article on ketogenic diet adherence peer-reviewed View
MDPI Nutrients journal peer-reviewed View
NCBI Books peer-reviewed View
PubMed peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
Wikipedia institutional View
What research hasn't answered 3 gaps
PMC peer-reviewed View
British Journal of Nutrition peer-reviewed View
Frontiers in Nutrition peer-reviewed View
PMC meta-analysis peer-reviewed View
Cochrane systematic review peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
British Journal of Nutrition peer-reviewed View
Frontiers in Nutrition peer-reviewed View
PMC meta-analysis peer-reviewed View
Cochrane systematic review peer-reviewed View
Sources 20 findings
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
2008 Shai argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
2020 Cochrane argumentation
2018 Gardner argumentation
Harvard argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
Push back on this read

Think the evidence is read wrong? Present your counter-evidence and we'll evaluate it against the 42 sources behind this analysis.

Related questions
Is coffee actually good for you? Were we wrong about eggs and cholesterol? Is the carnivore diet healthy? Does meal timing affect metabolism?

Heard something that sounds off?

Generated by reaso.ai's editorial pipeline: claim restated, scientific consensus classified via 3-run majority vote, 20 findings enriched with attribution and study type, narrative written in neutral voice. No individual researcher has signed off on this specific analysis — see methodology for how the pipeline works. Built with Claude Sonnet by Anthropic. Updated April 16, 2026. How we do this →

Written by AI. Sources are linked for verification.