Scientific consensus contradicts this claim.

What's still open

What the evidence found 3 findings
Based on 13 sources:
PMC/NCBI peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
Dr. Daniel Amen Facebook blog View
NCBI - NIH institutional View
ScienceDirect peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
ScienceDirect Topics institutional View
Nature peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
PubMed peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
Journal of Neurochemistry meta-analysis on catecholamine depletion studies peer-reviewed
Based on 13 sources:
ResearchGate institutional View
PMC peer-reviewed View
ScienceDirect peer-reviewed View
Harvard Health Blog institutional View
News Medical news View
PMC article on Adrenoceptor Desensitization peer-reviewed View
PubMed research article peer-reviewed View
PMC NIH article on D1 Dopamine Receptor Phosphorylation peer-reviewed View
University of Pennsylvania institutional View
2-Minute Neuroscience unknown View
PMC peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
Preprints.org institutional View
Based on 13 sources:
PMC article peer-reviewed View
ScienceDirect peer-reviewed View
Facebook post blog View
PMC - NIH peer-reviewed View
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience peer-reviewed View
Harvard Health institutional View
StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf peer-reviewed View
Khan Academy institutional View
Quizlet blog View
Volkow et al., Journal of Neuroscience, 2001 peer-reviewed
PMC article on amphetamine-induced dopamine sensitization peer-reviewed View
PMC article on d-amphetamine sensitization study peer-reviewed View
Springer article on psychostimulant disruption of dopamine homeostasis peer-reviewed View
What research hasn't answered 3 gaps
PMC article peer-reviewed View
ScienceDirect peer-reviewed View
Facebook post blog View
PMC - NIH peer-reviewed View
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience peer-reviewed View
PMC article peer-reviewed View
ScienceDirect peer-reviewed View
Facebook post blog View
PMC - NIH peer-reviewed View
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience peer-reviewed View
Sources 21 findings
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
Push back on this read

Think the evidence is read wrong? Present your counter-evidence and we'll evaluate it against the 44 sources behind this analysis.

Related questions
Can chess prevent cognitive decline? Do opposites attract or do birds of a feather flock together? Does playing chess make you smarter? Can positive affirmations be harmful?

Heard something that sounds off?

Generated by reaso.ai's editorial pipeline: claim restated, scientific consensus classified via 3-run majority vote, 21 findings enriched with attribution and study type, narrative written in neutral voice. No individual researcher has signed off on this specific analysis — see methodology for how the pipeline works. Built with Claude Sonnet by Anthropic. Updated April 16, 2026. How we do this →

Written by AI. Sources are linked for verification.