Skip to content

Scientific consensus contradicts this claim.

What's still open

What the evidence found 3 findings
Based on 12 sources:
UCL News institutional View
Scientific American news View
PMC peer-reviewed View
Forbes news View
WRAL news View
PMC peer-reviewed View
ScienceDirect peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
PMC - Time to Form a Habit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis peer-reviewed View
Study Finds news View
ZME Science news View
American Council on Science and Health institutional View
Based on 7 sources:
Scientific American news View
PMC peer-reviewed View
University of Surrey News institutional View
UCL News institutional View
PMC - Making health habitual: the psychology of habit-formation peer-reviewed View
PMC - NIH peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
Based on 9 sources:
Brain Canada institutional View
Springer Nature academic publication peer-reviewed View
PMC article on observational studies peer-reviewed View
Sage Research Methods - Experimental Designs institutional View
ScienceAlert news View
PMC peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
What research hasn't answered 2 gaps
UCL News institutional View
Scientific American news View
PMC peer-reviewed View
Forbes news View
WRAL news View
UCL News institutional View
Scientific American news View
PMC peer-reviewed View
Forbes news View
WRAL news View
Sources 18 findings
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
Dr. Phillippa Lally · University College London argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
Maxwell Maltz argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
Dr. Lally argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
Dr. Phillippa Lally · University College London argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
1960 Maltz argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
Push back on this read

Think the evidence is read wrong? Present your counter-evidence and we'll evaluate it against the 30 sources behind this analysis.

Related questions

Heard something that sounds off?

Generated by reaso.ai's editorial pipeline: claim restated, scientific consensus classified via 3-run majority vote, 18 findings enriched with attribution and study type, narrative written in neutral voice. No individual researcher has signed off on this specific analysis — see methodology for how the pipeline works. Built with Claude Sonnet by Anthropic. Updated April 16, 2026. How we do this →

Written by AI. Sources are linked for verification.