Scientific consensus contradicts this claim.

What's still open

What the evidence found 3 findings
Based on 8 sources:
Myers & Briggs Foundation institutional View
Assessing Test-Retest Reliability of Psychological Measures peer-reviewed View
The Role of Response Styles in the Assessment of Intraindividual Variability peer-reviewed View
Internal Consistency, Retest Reliability, and their Implications peer-reviewed View
PubMed longitudinal meta-analysis peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate differential stability study peer-reviewed View
PMC individual differences study peer-reviewed View
Psychological Science journal study by Pittenger (1993) peer-reviewed
Based on 11 sources:
ScienceDirect peer-reviewed View
Taylor & Francis Online peer-reviewed View
ClearerThinking.org institutional View
PMC article on meta-analysis heterogeneity peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate publication bias volume institutional View
American Behavioral Scientist journal peer-reviewed View
International Journal of Social Science Research peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate publication on MBTI psychometric limitations peer-reviewed View
StudoCu systematic review document institutional View
Based on 8 sources:
PubMed peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
University of Kent institutional View
Personality and Career Success: Concurrent and Longitudinal peer-reviewed View
Longitudinal Effects of Employees' Big Five Personality Traits peer-reviewed View
Personality-job fit in terms of the Big Five peer-reviewed View
The Myers-Briggs Company institutional View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
What research hasn't answered 3 gaps
Myers & Briggs Foundation institutional View
Assessing Test-Retest Reliability of Psychological Measures peer-reviewed View
The Role of Response Styles in the Assessment of Intraindividual Variability peer-reviewed View
Internal Consistency, Retest Reliability, and their Implications peer-reviewed View
PubMed longitudinal meta-analysis peer-reviewed View
ScienceDirect peer-reviewed View
Taylor & Francis Online peer-reviewed View
ClearerThinking.org institutional View
PMC article on meta-analysis heterogeneity peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate publication bias volume institutional View
PubMed peer-reviewed View
PMC peer-reviewed View
University of Kent institutional View
Personality and Career Success: Concurrent and Longitudinal peer-reviewed View
Longitudinal Effects of Employees' Big Five Personality Traits peer-reviewed View
Sources 18 findings
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
Push back on this read

Think the evidence is read wrong? Present your counter-evidence and we'll evaluate it against the 32 sources behind this analysis.

Related questions
Do people become more conservative with age? Can chess prevent cognitive decline? Are learning styles real? Is venting anger actually helpful?

Heard something that sounds off?

Generated by reaso.ai's editorial pipeline: claim restated, scientific consensus classified via 3-run majority vote, 18 findings enriched with attribution and study type, narrative written in neutral voice. No individual researcher has signed off on this specific analysis — see methodology for how the pipeline works. Built with Claude Sonnet by Anthropic. Updated April 16, 2026. How we do this →

Written by AI. Sources are linked for verification.