Skip to content

Scientific consensus contradicts this claim.

What's still open

What the evidence found 3 findings
Based on 13 sources:
PMC/NCBI peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
Science Daily news View
Vanderbilt University SMPY institutional View
PubMed peer-reviewed View
PMC Systematic Review peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate Educational Study peer-reviewed View
ERIC Educational Research peer-reviewed View
University of Surrey institutional View
PMC Research Article peer-reviewed View
Medical Xpress news View
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences peer-reviewed View
Academic research compilation peer-reviewed View
Based on 11 sources:
PMC Systematic Review peer-reviewed View
MedlinePlus institutional View
PMC Narrative Review peer-reviewed View
NPR news View
Sites at Penn State institutional View
The Guardian news View
PMC peer-reviewed View
Liverpool John Moores University institutional View
PMC - The Training and Development of Elite Sprint Performance peer-reviewed View
PMC - Muscle Fiber Type Transitions with Exercise Training peer-reviewed View
PubMed - Muscle fibre type changes with sprint training peer-reviewed View
Based on 6 sources:
PubMed peer-reviewed View
MSN news View
Journal of Expertise peer-reviewed View
Chess.com institutional View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
Science Daily news View
What research hasn't answered 3 gaps
PMC/NCBI peer-reviewed View
ResearchGate peer-reviewed View
Science Daily news View
Vanderbilt University SMPY institutional View
PubMed peer-reviewed View
Sources 19 findings
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
tree-leaf argumentation
argumentation Unknown
argumentation Unknown
Push back on this read

Think the evidence is read wrong? Present your counter-evidence and we'll evaluate it against the 31 sources behind this analysis.

Related questions

Heard something that sounds off?

Generated by reaso.ai's editorial pipeline: claim restated, scientific consensus classified via 3-run majority vote, 19 findings enriched with attribution and study type, narrative written in neutral voice. No individual researcher has signed off on this specific analysis — see methodology for how the pipeline works. Built with Claude Sonnet by Anthropic. Updated April 16, 2026. How we do this →

Written by AI. Sources are linked for verification.